Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

A Message To LBT

I have some suggestions that might save your company.

  1. Convert ALL salary people to hourly. Clock in/clock out. People should only get paid for the time they are actually contributing to the company. This would eliminate double-dippers (2+ jobs), people sleeping in their cars, checking out to "pick up kids from school/daycare", etc.
  2. Remove social media from work. I saw way too many people spend their day online when I was there. Just block all of the offending sites. This site is already blocked in Oregon.
  3. Fire most managers. HR should be dealing with time off, etc. You can eliminate most 1st and 2nd level managers and wouldn't notice a difference. You might even see an increase in productivity. They are usually the narcissist roadblocks causing project delays.
  4. Your VP's getting paid $500k+ should earn it. They should be managing their divisions and projects. They also don't need all of the career yes-men surrounding them.
  5. Fire all principle engineers and fellows. I can't honestly say I have ever seen them contribute to anything new or groundbreaking, or even do something useful to keep a project moving. They usually just pop into meetings long enough to cause trouble and project setbacks, then leave.
  6. Move annual reviews to an external testing company. Make all employees take an annual test like the ACT/GRE to justify their knowledge base and salary. Make it so employees need to pass with high score in their field of work to get promotion, pass with C or better to keep job, and demote people who just aren't cut out for the job.

There's probably more, but this would certainly help flush out the people who have helped spiral the company.

by
| 2452 views | | 13 replies (last March 24, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jq2dp47k

13 replies (most recent on top)

Exempts enjoy unlimited time off.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e1+1jq2dp47k

I agree with some of this list but isn't it tedious to keep regurgitating post after post about what the CEO and Board should do.

They don't care what some low level employee thinks, and for good reason.

No offense, but as bad as the Board and many CEOs have been, the company would have gone under a long time ago if led by a bunch of fab monkeys.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dz+1jq2dp47k

these suggestions written by freshers

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dw+1jq2dp47k

Yeah, Fire Those Guys!

Fire Them Yesterday.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ds+1jq2dp47k

Tell him to his face. Write him an email. Grow a pair, OP.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dq+1jq2dp47k
  1. Add a G to your name, right after the L. The G can be gansta.
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @db+1jq2dp47k

this suggestion is better: All BOD and c level should have their pay cut by 50%. once they able to save intel and revive intel leadership, they will get back their pay with interest. that will be a better solution

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c7+1jq2dp47k

merit based quarterly focals. perform above standards 2 of 4 or face performance review. ez...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ar+1jq2dp47k

One of the most stupid post I’ve seen on this website. Good luck to you man and your family and if you are a manager I really feel pity for your team.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aq+1jq2dp47k

GRE.. lol

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1jq2dp47k

OP, you say “when I was there” so you are not there and some of your suggestions just su-k!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1jq2dp47k

1 - Go for it. Put me hourly. If the "no tax on OT" goes through, I will be able to easily retire in 5 years from all the hours I put in.
2 - Not only Oregon
3 - No. Convert to IC's with performance reviews.
4 - Convert to a minimal salary with performance bonuses that are visionary goals
5 - Only the ones without actionable patents.
6 - Sure, like an outside company would do any better. This is just another way to enable CPM's. Have the backbone to do it themselves.

The biggest thing Intel can do, and others have said this before, is hold PE's and managers accountable for their employees/projects. If a project doesn't pan out, move folks around. More then 2 failed projects, moved out the door.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1jq2dp47k

Post a reply

: