I've heard that in some teams, only 10–20% of those who applied for the VLP were approved. If the goal is truly to simplify and become more agile, shouldn't these so-called "obsolete" (BG's words) teams/roles be eliminated entirely rather than partially? The VLP selection process seems somewhat random, and not just based on skillsets, unless there’s a hidden list of people being targeted for removal. Anyone else heard of similar cases?
5 replies (most recent on top)
Performance rating over 4 got mostly rejection…. Getting 2k € more in bonus, but now not getting a VLP which would be around 80k€ + if you would have bad performance ,…. Nice intensives
After been enticed to wonder about leaving the company, involve the family and take a decision, been brave and apply for the VLP...to finally been rejected. I wonder how the company expects employees to just keep working as nothing has happened.
I mean, there must be some serious sadist--c energy coming from the SLT to agree with such process.
Oh look, here talks Mr. Anonymous “THE PROPHET”
No worries, you will just be fired via the social plan. It's cheaper.
voluntary leave you can't volunteer for, what a joke