Thread regarding NetApp layoffs

The Plan.

It seems evident that the plan has been outlined during today’s call and how they will identify who to target. My opinion is

  • Those not complying with the office attendance policy will likely face eventual separation.
  • Employees receiving poor performance ratings in their Thrive discussions will be subject to termination.
  • Team members who don't generate sufficient Q4 revenue, potentially affecting overall targets, will also be let go.

My impression is that these decisions have already been made. Typically workforce reductions are planned well ahead of time, often weeks or months before implementation. Management simply needs a justification to execute the plan. Fourth quarter results will determine many people’s' futures, including George's.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ The lawyer will lay the law.

Go to the office, perform, and create business.

by
| 6703 views | | 14 replies (last March 19, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jnphe7sv

14 replies (most recent on top)

  • kM should for sure be on that list.
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @232+1jnphe7sv

Reducing the workforce won’t drive NetApp to a higher revenue goal—it might improve profitability in the short term, but long-term growth requires more than just cost-cutting. Sustainable revenue growth comes from product innovation, market expansion, strong sales execution, and competitive differentiation. Without those, aggressive cuts risk undermining the very foundation needed to scale.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @14b+1jnphe7sv

As a former manager, stack ranking your own team is only part of the process. Your team has to go up against peer managers, and your manager (senior manager or whatever is a level "up") has numbers they have to hit for each bucket for 1s, 2s, 3s, 4s, and 5s. And their manager/director, and so on. I had to fudge numbers I felt strongly about just to make my team fit a prescribed amount in each bucket. It stinks, but that's the way it is. And the ICs know it, too. None of this is a mystery.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zq+1jnphe7sv

My experience with prior layoff planning. Stack ranks are typically established months in advance but there are negotiations up to pretty much the day before. Being first to go on the list doesn't mean a sure cut because critical skills without redundancy will earn you a pass. Managers know the current stack but are often in the dark until the night before of the actual depth. Sometimes the stack is freeing a certain amount of dollars sometimes it's people. The negotiations on the management side are Machiavellian. I can't see RTO being leveraged for termination with cause. It's a very shaky position that's probably not worth the risk. I also can't see skipping severance packages. Reducing yes skipping no. Severance isn't for you because they care it's a lawsuit mitigation mechanism.

I have no insight into the current state of our affairs as I've stepped out of the management world, it can be truly miserable. But, some advice. Document things now. Get copies of important documents now. Start cleaning personal stuff that shouldn't be on your devices now. It's all good habits anyway. If there is a RIF and you are impacted don't sign anything until you've read everything over twice and take advantage of everything they offer.

Again I have no clue when or if anything is planned or being planned. These are just insights from past experience.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wq+1jnphe7sv

The lists have not been finalized. Stop making things up. We still don’t know when the layoffs will be or how big, but we are pretty sure they are coming.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @v5+1jnphe7sv

Everybody uses RTO as a soft purge.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @v3+1jnphe7sv

The lists are already finalized. There is nothing you can do to change it. The lists have been done for several weeks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @th+1jnphe7sv

the gameplan is to layoff due to performance so THERES NO SEVERANCE. its not a layoff i guess?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g4+1jnphe7sv

Layoffs with severance are a thing of the past. Welcome the Trump-style layoff era, based on manufactured performance and attendance metrics and no severance.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @er+1jnphe7sv

NetApp Operations team maybe?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dp+1jnphe7sv

That's naive, if they wanted to lay people of they would just do it. They have before and they will again. They wouldn't invent some complicated scheme first.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dd+1jnphe7sv

What do you folks think, when is layoff expected? Any idea about which org or teams gonna face the wrath of it?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bc+1jnphe7sv

Wounded, not ki-led, surely?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1jnphe7sv

Lack of innovation and hubris have ki-led NetApp. All the rest of that nonsense is just window dressing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1jnphe7sv

Post a reply

: