Why not Jim Keller?
12 replies (most recent on top)
Intel is not for the light hearted. One side is the complexity of both product and manufacturing vertically integrated, other is the highly political environment. I don't think there is none out there who has expertise in both manufacturing and design !
We can go on and on debating what is wrong here, sharing opinions...intel need to be split, it's time !
He couldn't stay as Intel VP for 1 year. Runaway rooster !
He can fix your broken video cards for gaming but he cannot move up to be a CEO. That spot is reserved only for elite financial id--ts to sell the company.
Keller is an ogre and alcoholic, he is completely unfit for a CEO role. He might me a genius CPU designer, but definitely not a leader.
Let an AI run the company. Honest to goodness. How could it be any worse? Intel can’t make stuff on time. Cant even make competitive products. Everyone associated with this company is a failure.
If ya can’t beat em, join em?
Jim Keller is just all talk and no substance
Honestly we don’t need a new CEO. Like why? To be CEO for 2-3 more months?
Because he’s not a leader
LOL. He has his strengths but he can't lead Intel, he would even accelerate the crash instead.
Does he have a time machine to undo all the past damage ?
Jim is already running a company he loves, but really outside of him, not many I would say have the chops to manage a true IDM. I really think Co-CEO is the way to go, expertise over Factory/fab and over product. But junk Intel Corporate as well as the board. Go lean.
Can Jim break the laws of economics?