This is getting to be ridiculous. Nearly 3 months after CEO was fired, this once iconic Dow Jones member company is still without a CEO. Meanwhile, every day comes with a new rumor about a split, an acquisition, a spin-off and whatever else. WTF are the jokers on the board doing? They have 1 job and 1 job only - to hire a CEO. Instead why are they directly talking to the government and to potential acquirers? This is called an activist board. Every single one of these do-nothing jokers should be voted out of the Board.
11 replies (most recent on top)
Blind leading the blind. Intel is truly in the toilet
At this stage Intel needs a capable and thrust worthy board. CEO is not much of a material. Whoever they bring in as a CEO will need to dace to the board's tunes. With a bad board Intel will get a bad CEO. Just look at the history.
Too late. It's like putting a heating pad to a dead person. No use
The reason we aren't hearing much is that it's going to be bad and VPs, ELTs, fellows, PEs etc, want to make sure they get their money in the end. So they walk away unscathed.
Let’s do over/under
I call July for new CEO
You can also pick a time for split or acquisition
Why do you need a CEO for a dead company or going to be sold one ? Just choose any id--t in there.
You ain't seen nothing yet. The economy is about to tank. Intel woes will seem like the good old days.
After BK was shown the door it took a year and a half to find Pat. That was the best we could come up with.
The fact that there is no CEO announcement confirms negotiations are in progress by the BOD to either split the company or sell off foundry side since Intel does not know how to run a foundry business with a profit.
We are 2-faced like in Batman
Face it. You have two CEOs.