Look I’m sorry that there were fatalities and that’s sad. But if you design a scorecard for safety and we get a 1.7x don’t arbitrarily change it to a 1x and sc--w everyone. Instead build a better scorecard for the next year if you care so much about fatalities.
7 replies (most recent on top)
Whatever can do to save money is top priority for Enbridge.
Work safe. ( as long as it does not cost too much )
LOL, Enbridge givith, and Enbridge taketh away...........
Moving the goal posts was a predictable outcome.
I dont work in safety how come it effects my stip being lower!!! Is my question ! I have nothing to do what happend woth those people ... these are all excuses only , rich gets richer, poor poore, thanks Greg - you su-k as a leader with rest of the leadership!
While everyone agrees these fatalities are tragic and don’t meet our standards, the company could have but didn’t make this part of the 2024 metrics knowing that fatalities are a possibility. These fatalities did not occur yesterday and overriding a pre-set goal at pay-out time seems disingenuous at best and dishonest at worst considering the cost cutting that’s taking place and Wall Street concerns about our high costs and profitability. Optics are worse — let’s take advantage of this to save some money. It would be better to say this is unacceptable and announce fatalities will override safety metrics going forward — that would be the best way to put everyone on notice for the rest of 2025.
If you didn’t see the override of the multiplier coming, that’s on you. Doesn’t really matter what they are blaming it on, it was sure to happen.
Safety first always at Enbridge... err sorry I meant Profits over everything! What was safety doing to prevent all these fatalities?