Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Pray Broadcom does not acquire INTC

Hi, ex-VMware guy here who just went thru the trauma of being acquired by, and integrated into, Broadcom. While certainly there is a lot of turmoil and uncertainty within INTC at the moment, for your sake as an INTC employee I truly hope that you are not acquired by Broadcom. Please allow me to provide a few facts to help you understand why:

  1. Broadcom is effectively a publicly-traded private equity firm disguised as a semiconductor and infrastructure software vendor. Everything (and I mean everything) is managed via P&L spreadsheet. Cuts come fast and deep, and never end.
  1. BC cares little about its employees, partners or customers. Decisions are made quickly, in a “ready-fire-aim” fashion, without serious evaluation of downstream impacts and with extremely poor internal communication. Ex: I had sales reps discover VMW no longer supported fixed-fee services contracts when the BC deals desk REJECTED agreements that customers had signed. AYFKM?
  1. BC is such a stark place to work, they have no choice but to offer oversized comp to employees. Base salary is decent/about average, then they load everyone up with a massive RSU grant – in my case 4x what I was granted as a VMW employee. BC boasts that they pay the best in the industry. Think about why they do that.
  1. Broadcom has an incredibly flat command-and-control organization. Every business unit is a completely independent division, with its own P&L. At the top sits Hock Tan who makes just about every decision in the entire company (does the man ever sleep?). During integration planning the general guideline was no employee should be more than 5 layers removed from Hock. Managers have massive spans of control (some literally >100+ direct reports). When I took an early exit package to leave the company, my exit had to be individually approved by Hock himself.

Finally, you may hear people say “Broadcom has no culture”. That’s not true. Broadcom does have a culture… it’s a culture of fear (of being the next to be laid off), appeasement (robotically execute every decision that’s made by Hock without question) and greed (how can I acquire more RSUs and stick around to vest them). People keep their heads down, and march in formation. I’ve found a more appropriate way to capture the BC zeitgeist is that “Broadcom has no soul”. There is no higher purpose than boosting margin, period. No sense of mission. No sense of team. No empathy for partners or customers. No thought of supporting or contributing to the community. Sure, every company has a fiduciary duty to return profits to shareholders, but at BC that is THE ONLY priority – sc--w employees, partners and even customers.

I wish all INTC employees the best of luck, as your proud company navigates the challenging waters ahead.

by
| 12751 views | | 29 replies (last March 2, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jma1mkz4

29 replies (most recent on top)

The hardest thing about working for BC is each quarter you have hard decisions to make. "Do I buy the Porsche, Boat, or Lambo this time". Look, Broadcom is not going to wipe your butt and tuck you into bed at night, they are not going to give you free artisanal coffee, no team building events with trust falls (thank god), but they pay you well and that's really all the nourishment I need.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @262+1jma1mkz4

If they do then Intel deserves a good flushing. So many people are used to getting to leave when it gets hard at work with no consequences. They delay projects because they are coddled. When will people just work hard at work and go home happy. When will people stop looking only out for themselves. Loads of Machiavellian workers by which the company isn't on their interest list. Instead, people blame the size of the company or the distance they have to walk to get a tool to be outside their job description. That culture is life cancer and deserves a overhaul. If broaching was any bit along the lines of minimizing waste there is a line there. Waste isn't so gets paid the most but productivity and involvement in the team is value that they don't measure. Good luck! I'm gone.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @16m+1jma1mkz4

Sound like they are too efficient, too agile , and work too hard. They need to be more like Intel ("My personal truth is that the product doesn't need to be on time") .....

Broadcom probably doesn't even have massages in cafeteria and allow unlimited PTO for when your cat is feeling emotional. That is why they are not growing and why no one buys products from them and investors hate them. They will be bankrupt in 2 years...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rp+1jma1mkz4

Keep you Tan's seperated. Hock Tan Broadcom CEO and Lip Bu Tan resigned from Intel board. In the end they are all from Taiwan including Nvidia CEO and AMD CEO. Be prepared to work hard after buyout.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kq+1jma1mkz4

Wasn't Hock Tan the guy that resigned from the Intel board? I guess he must have proposed this back then and Pat didn't agree with it. Sounds like the design side of Intel goes to Broadcom, and the manufacturing side goes to global foundries. Who keeps the name?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jy+1jma1mkz4

Sounds like what Dell is turning into. Do you think Hoc might want MDs company?!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hs+1jma1mkz4

So what about their DEI programs?!?! LOL......

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gn+1jma1mkz4

Intel employees get what they deserve!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gm+1jma1mkz4

VMW had ~35,000 employees when the Broadcom acquisition closed the week before the U.S. Thanksgiving holiday in November 2023. The objective (which is openly discussed within the company) is to end up somewhere around 7,000 by later this calendar year. A few thousand departed with the spin-out of the EUC business into Omnissa, but the vast majority were simply RIFd.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ed+1jma1mkz4

OP is 100% correct. I have worked for the micromanaging Hock Tan.
He employs Asian (i.e. slave labor) tactics.
Intel is a friggen Spring Break compared to Broadcom.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c2+1jma1mkz4

I love the description provided by OP. That's how the company is going to survive and thrive. Do not worry so much about the job.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bd+1jma1mkz4

"The difficulty in dealing with the emotional needs of native-born employees may have a lot to do with the massive hiring of H1Bs with full knowledge of the widespread fraud."

Not really. The relatioship is purely 1 way.
Americans create the companies, the 'H1bs' live off them.
When are the H1bs going to create companies of their own in their own countries
and bring in foreigners to work at those.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bc+1jma1mkz4

This post convinced me to buy BC stock.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bb+1jma1mkz4

What you describe of Broadcom work environment and organization sounds a lot like Intel (until about 1999), NVDA, and many other wildly sucessful companies.

They are generally not a pleasant place to work, and often employees are pitted against each other.

They also use stack ranking and each quarter layoff the Bottom 5%, while continuing to hire. The whole point of such an organization is to retain only those people who can perform well above average.

All the Mega Tech companies are moving back to this, simply because it works better than any other system.

Over the past 25 years Intel squandered its culture and the organization became one of empire building, with managers totally focused on increasing their direct reports, often to the companies detriment. This is how tech companies fail.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ba+1jma1mkz4

Welcome to work 3.0. The rich will squeeze blood out of you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b8+1jma1mkz4

I may be wrong, but I'm betting against anyone buying INTC unless its a giveaway price or even subsidized. It's not your average biz and dealing with it would be highly complex, messy and very very expensive. Economic conditions are heading downward, not a good time to buy into a white elephant. Sounds like the BC folks are savy enough to know that.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b4+1jma1mkz4

Broadcom would buy design and products for the IP.

I suspect a surprisingly small number of existing employees would remain after a year or so.

If nothing else they are redundant to groups which already exist in Broadcom.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b1+1jma1mkz4

American workers expect too much from a workplace. Not all companies are doing civilization changing stuff. You go there to bring paycheck back to your own life and family. That's all.

The difficulty in dealing with the emotional needs of native-born employees may have a lot to do with the massive hiring of H1Bs with full knowledge of the widespread fraud.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aw+1jma1mkz4

First to go would be the people with 20+ years doing nothing to upgrade their skills and get themselves in management positions and Sr. PE

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @as+1jma1mkz4

"At least there is direction and a well thought out strategy…"

Hock is famously known for having admitted in a recent press interview, that there is no larger company-wide strategy at Broadcom. He buys individual franchises, that may have little to no synergy among them, purely for the accretive financial impact. This is exactly how GE operated in the late-80s and 1990s under Neutron Jack Welch, and look how that turned out.

That said, Broadcom does have a brutally simple operating model. There's an elegant simplicity to it all. But the path to mash acquired companies into it's simplistic model leaves employee bodies strewn about, and pi---s off a lot of customers and partners.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @an+1jma1mkz4

Atleast there is direction and a well thought out strategy….Intel has had none of that the past 15 years. I would welcome the change. On the development, there are so many development offerings online now you can do yourself. No need for HR to recommend training that is way off the mark of what reality is. I don’t need drills at work, I can make my own after work. The writers description sounds pretty good to me:) after all, it is called work!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @am+1jma1mkz4

Pray it’s not GF. They are so smug right now that we dethroned them from bottom of barrel.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ak+1jma1mkz4

Fake influentials in Intel are in for a very rude awakening.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ag+1jma1mkz4

Humans require a certain minimum level of nutrients, calories, vitamins every day to survive. The simplest and cheapest way to do this would be consuming tasteless paste from a squeeze tube. Cheap and simple, this gives you all the nourishment you require and because it's tasteless there is only a single tube to stock in the cupboard. The added cost and trouble of preparing a plate of food, using utensils, and perhaps enjoying your meal with a friend of family member, doesn't add to the nourishment.

This is the essence of life as a BC employee. You are committing to a diet of tasteless paste from a squeeze tube, in exchange for higher-than-market compensation. Some people find a path to personal fulfillment from this arrangement. However many do not, and frankly most won't have the option to even try because they'll be RIFd no matter what they want.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1jma1mkz4

Broadcom is like the doom machine from Star Trek, vacuuming up planets, spitting out product lines that fall below ROI. Sometimes he sells them off intact, sometimes he cuts and slashes to meet ROI. The OP and others are dead on. The only meaningful hope are large RSU grants.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1jma1mkz4

seems to be working better than intel's approach for the past 10 years.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1jma1mkz4

LOL yes - BC is like Game of Thrones. Every quarter Hock displays a single slide at the company-wide Coffee Talk meeting plotting every division's latest quarterly profitability result vs. what he literally refers to as The Line of Doom (the line denoting the company's overall profitability target). Then he calls out every division that fell below the Line of Doom and proclaims in front of the entire company "gee I hope they get their act together this quarter".

Absolutely dystopian.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1jma1mkz4

This is spot-on. I've worked at quite a few high-tech companies in my 30+ year career, but I have never worked for a company as lean as Broadcom. I was part of an acquired company, and stayed for 8 months in a transition role. I had IT issues blocking me from accessing key BC systems. I opened a help ticket the day the acquisition closed, and on the day I left 8 months later the ticket was still open and I still didn't have access to those systems.

Veteran BC people I worked with just shrugged and told me that's the way it goes, sometimes. It's good to be frugal, but BC takes things beyond the pale IMHO. There's truth to that old saying: "Penny wise, Pound foolish". Good luck if they buy your company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1jma1mkz4

I am a 7-year BC employee. Because I've miraculously survived for so long, I've been able to vest enough RSUs to purchase a beach house and several local rental properties (all in cash). However, it's been a real grind. This poster above nails a lot of the key details. If you are acquired by BC, better hold onto your seats. There are zero frills, you will get practically nothing in the way of professional development here.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1jma1mkz4

Post a reply

: