Pat saw that the best way to market was to let the early adopters overspend and run themselves into a ditch.
It is the 1990s internet play, back when he was CTO.
Pat is still here and Global Crossing is not.
Pat saw that the best way to market was to let the early adopters overspend and run themselves into a ditch.
It is the 1990s internet play, back when he was CTO.
Pat is still here and Global Crossing is not.
I don't recall PG projecting that AMD would beat on earnings and forecast a strong Q1.
AMD's main problem is the same as Intel's, their CPU product line is based on x86.
Pat to the Future!
Because having 0 dollars in AI revenue is somehow better than AMD’s 7 billion?
Good thinking Pat!
Intel spends more than Nvidia on R&D and vastly more than AMD and still has negative returns on investment.
How so? Didn’t he decide to go with Gaudi instead of evolving our datacenter GPUs?