yes he will, and relatively soon, contrary to the myth of his 'anti-China' policies.
14 replies (most recent on top)
@cz fcking hilarious the delusional intel influentials who can't even be in the same room as where president elect formerly sneezed
No he was the one to put them on during his first term. Dont you remember that frantic halt all contact?
Trumps family rich >>>>>> your upper-middle class existence
@cx+... define top security... Just about everyone who hasn't been drinking the kool-aid the DNC has been serving wanted him and can't wait until next Monday. Let the rodeo begin... I am pretty sure they won't be lecturing me on which pronouns to use.
trump plays by his own rules. Top security didn't want him and was doing their best to get voters to not have him in office again because he is a threat. But the price of eggs and mass deportation won. So if more jobs are lost because he's rolling the dice with his buddies in China, you all can pick fruits and vegetables and scrub toilets. In reality that's where AmeriKKKa is headed now.
lol i have some indicators but would let darwinism play out
If the competitors are not technically capable, deligent and motivated, can they make a dent with all the so called IP stealing?
Installing new tariffs and then removing restrictions is counterproductive. If anything he will add to it.
Wouldn’t fair competition require china to develop their own semiconductor products?
both india and china steal patents like i drink water
Trump will sell the restriction removal as 'good for the trade deficit', but it's really all about money in his party's pocket. The obvious significant military risks play second fiddle to that. Russia will also get a free ride, starting day one.
And they have a history of stealing IP and many other forms of corruption in Xi’s 50 Cent Party. F that
encourage head to head competitions
Uh, the country with the cheap slave labor always wins.
I feel that removing the restrictions and encourage head to head competitions in the free trade environment is the best for both US and China. The protectionism can only weaken the competitiveness of US. This applies to Intel also.