Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Please RTO

We are already well into January 2025 please get us back to the office ASAP so that we can close this large gap of inadequate and under performing personnel

by
| 1071 views | | 10 replies (last January 8, 2025) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jgxy2xkt

10 replies (most recent on top)

Ops main accomplishment over the past several years is sitting in a cube.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jf+1jgxy2xkt

@ba, hey Jack Wagon nobody thinks Intel’s issues are solved by a single solution because they are vast.

In fact I think the interview questions were d-mbed down when they hired you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bs+1jgxy2xkt

Sounds like people on both sides who wanna come to the office and others who wanna still hang out at home this will be a tough nut to crack for Intel. We’ll see what they do. My money is on them telling people to come back. I think they want to force attrition as well.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @be+1jgxy2xkt

Man - who the f is you ? So relentless with the bto posts...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bd+1jgxy2xkt

Maybe we should lay off everyone who thinks the entire problem with Intel is that employees are hybrid. :) We don't need that kind of idiocy running around the company.

In fact, put it on an interview guide to avoid hiring people who think issues are solvable with a single solution.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ba+1jgxy2xkt

It's day 6 you ja----s. Well into Jan ?? No wonder Intel is going down the drain

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b1+1jgxy2xkt

I am almost sure this BTO person is one person. A low life employee or ex employee

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @at+1jgxy2xkt

FOH

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1jgxy2xkt

It seems like it's just 1 disturbed person who's infatuated with this idea. Keeps posting over and over again RTO. May be a lab rat who has to go in every day.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1jgxy2xkt

That would most likely just drive more talent away. I don’t understand why some people think demanding everyone back in the office will help at all.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1jgxy2xkt

Post a reply

: