Thread regarding Apache Corp. layoffs

Weren’t the execs getting sued?

What happened with the investor lawsuit?? Any news?

by
| 2671 views | | 11 replies (last July 29, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1c2kphMC

11 replies (most recent on top)

Well, wait now. When 8 people died in Egypt, yearly bonuses were slightly reduced.

Except for, quite likely, the execs who are getting sued.

So the company does care about EHS, but only to the extent that the execs can use it as an excuse to cut everyone’s bonuses except for their own.

As for the lawsuit, it is progressing slowly, as all lawsuits do.

And, of course, if things start looking bad for the execs, expect for them to make some big donations to judicial candidates. Or, if the case is federal court, they will just start paying for the judge’s vacation similar to the deals Scalia got.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2oeb+1c2kphMC

Okay yeah but like what about the lawsuit lmao mufuggas cant stay on topic

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2bcp+1c2kphMC

100% Apache doesn’t care about EHS. 8 people die in Egypt. Nothing.
KN as VP. LOL
“Hire a girl”, they say. Check…from an even worse company…with a crisis management background only. Wow
See something say something (but no one will answer).

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2anc+1c2kphMC

Sounds like someone in EH&S got triggered.

APA EH&S has been a huge joke for years but has never been in worse shape then the brutal group we have now. The CEO gives lip service to the market about how important EH&S is (as he has to) which makes this group feel like they are way more important/valuable then they are. Until there are zero recordable incidents, zero casualties and you are adding a clear NPV+ activity, sit down, shut up, and show up at the quarterly to present your 2 slides.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gzu+1c2kphMC

"SD being terminated was wrongful? Maybe having a Director of GOM EHS with no operated properties was wrong!"

I'm not really sure where to go with this. Like is this sarcasm or just plain ignorance? Or maybe, just maybe, I'm reading this wrong. I'll err on the side of ignorance because that's what stands out to me.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xax+1c2kphMC

SD being terminated was wrongful? Maybe having a Director of GOM EHS with no operated properties was wrong!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mku+1c2kphMC

Huh? Wrongful EHS terminations?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nao+1c2kphMC

The investor class action

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gwp+1c2kphMC

The "Class action?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dlv+1c2kphMC

So many cases to choose from. Be specific.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wof+1c2kphMC

Are you referring to the recent harassment allegations from a former senior executive, the Alpine High, the Supreme Court fiasco in the Chronicle or the impending wrongful terminations in EHS? Clarification please.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ocl+1c2kphMC

Post a reply

: