Thread regarding Ford layoffs

Mach E: Ready, Sell, Re-Engineer

The beginning of many issues to be “discovered” by customers.

The Ford Motor Company serves as the perfect example with the Mustang Mach-E, the all-electric crossover that may discharge the 12-volt battery while plugged in over janky software for the powertrain control module. As if that wasn’t bad enough for the Dearborn-based automaker, the Blue Oval has identified yet another software bug after a total of six vehicles have stopped without notice while they were driven down Eagle Road in Norway.
According to Motor.no, the vehicles were being driven on the steep road with maximum regenerative braking to gain battery charge. This led to the battery getting seriously hot and the wheels locking up, which are huge problems on their own. Anne Sønsteby, the information director at Ford Norway, said that a software update will rectify every single one of these conditions.
Pardon my French, but how could Ford’s engineers not identify this problem when the Mustang Mach-E was being trialed over hundreds of thousands of miles? Adding insult to injury, owners that aren’t aware of this problem won’t be informed via first-class mail as it’s the case with a recall. Instead, they’ll have to wait until September or October for an over-the-air update.
Pretending that the problem impacts only a few cars is how the Ford Motor Company tries to minimize the potential outcomes resulting from a Mustang Mach-E that bricks itself while driving downhill. In addition to a battery fire, locking the wheels on a winding road is a terrifying recipe for disaster.
Considering that Norwegians purchase more EVs than combustion-engined vehicles due to many perks and a looming ICE ban on new passenger cars, the Blue Oval may want to reconsider its customer service and transparency

by
| 1471 views | | 12 replies (last July 29, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1c16433c

12 replies (most recent on top)

Yup let’s keep hiring people with MIS (Management Information Systems) degrees instead of CIS (Computer Information Systems) degrees, because we want the all the C students who couldn’t actually hack the computing classes so they went the management route. Then let’s let those C students write critical software systems. What could go wrong?
One great developer with Masters in CIS could smoke a team of 100 C student MIS “developers”. Oh but wait, all employees are the same per HR and management. Ford logic dooms the company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3odx+1c16433c

It's hard to find good software people but that's not as important as how the team looks diversity wise.... because diversity equity and inclusion

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2vly+1c16433c

All of these added electrical systems & modules have exponentially increased the number of potential failure modes, but GPDS has not been altered appropriately to catch up with their detection and prove-out. They say “earlier breadboard” is the answer, but I’m not seeing the results.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vhv+1c16433c

The thing with software is less than 1% of the population has a brain wired such that they are excellent at writing software. Their brains just work that way. Their code works reliably, and they develop code effortlessly The entire time I was at Ford I came across only 6 of these people, and none of them are still at Ford. The first time I came across one I was shocked and humbled, I thought I was all that and a bag of chips. Then I realized well I was actually not that good and would never be great ( and I was the best on my team by far). Ford cannot keep the stellar software developers, that is just a fact.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ruc+1c16433c

Well that’s because software is hard and Ford cannot attract talented software engineers and cannot even retain talents .

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qtl+1c16433c

That's because there is too much reliance on CAD/CAE vs. Prototypes and testing. This along with purchasing putting the screws to suppliers and engineering management focusing on how to rebin warranty claims to hide them instead of actually fixing the problems has all resulted in horrible quality.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jpj+1c16433c

Ford: "Recalls are Job 1"

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tlk+1c16433c

At least we are consistent. Five decades of poor quality! Impressive.

And you bought newer Mustang’s for the rag top? Impressive.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nzc+1c16433c

It is a less than attractive vehicle anyway, and it can’t be a Mustang because there is no rag top option. I’ve owned six Mustangs, from 1965 to 2015, they were all poor quality in many ways.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oaz+1c16433c

The problem is the engineers are not listened to. Eventually the emails from engineers detailing issues will come to light (as they do with every issue turned to lawsuit). Engineers explain the problem, bonehead manager, director on up cover up/ dismiss the problem, SHTF and the “leadership” scapegoats some engineer and fires them, then the emails are leaked to the press. Rinse and Repeat.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @udc+1c16433c

https://youtu.be/k4XJNFZVWRw

Ford just wants your data, not opinion.

The nerve of some customers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eux+1c16433c

To Ford customers: A fool and their money are soon parted. Guinea pigs for Ford EV engineering. Don’t do it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hqm+1c16433c

Post a reply

: