Thread regarding Commscope Inc. layoffs

A lot of people think Ruckus is the cinderella child, and Arris is the unwanted step sister

As an investor in Ruckus, I have put together some thoughts, which I have acquired from reading the comments and from calling fellows, in the industry, who are, shall we say, in the know. And I hope this will help other investors not to make the same mistake I made in Commscope.

I have discovered two things. Number 1 is that they (meaning Arris employees) know a dirty little secret about Commscope. Except that it's no secret anymore. I understand that everyone knows it now, or so I am told.

And two is that they feel a certain misconception about Commscope's loyalty to Ruckus employees.

First, they obviously know something:

  1. Commscope tried to acquire Ruckus at the same time that Arris tried to acquire Ruckus.
  2. Arris acquired Ruckus. And Commscope lost out during the bidding process.
  3. Also, everybody knows that Commscope would not give up, and eventually acquired Arris to get Ruckus.
  4. And finally the interesting tidbits. Everybody (at Arris) thinks Commscope is going to lay off everyone at Arris and keep the Ruckus employees.

What they (Arris employees) don't seem to grasp, is this. There are a LOT more Ruckus employees leaving than the Arris employees realize. That seems to have come as a SHOCK to everyone.

Anyway, perhaps if nothing else, it's good to know you're not the unfavorable child, so to speak, anymore.

No more, "Marsha, Marsha, Marsha!"

Or in this case, "Ruckus, Ruckus, Ruckus!"

by
| 2171 views | | 5 replies (last April 28, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1aiRr9yu

5 replies (most recent on top)

RUCKUS management needs to understand that soon CS management will start looking at their “cost”. RUCKUS always acts like there is money for them to burn, just saw a project where they are going to spend thousands to get a proposal to create a report. Average cost of this third party to bring something to production is over $100k. Seriously, RUCKUS is a drain on resources. Their employees are abusive and they forget they work for CS/RUK rather then their customers. They have to stop bleeding money to show fake growth.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @idup+1aiRr9yu

There is a reason why Ruckus passed so many different owners. Great product and technology, but the go to market model and running costs are not worth it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5zkr+1aiRr9yu

Last week Ruckus also had laid offs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2qbl+1aiRr9yu

After Commscope finalized the purchase - Ruckus employees started leaving in droves.

Sometimes 3 Engineers in a week. Literally.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2bxd+1aiRr9yu

OG Ruckus people started bailing the minute the CommScope acquisition was announced. Some were just exhausted from the previous acquisitions and others had the insight to realize that CommScope had no high tech expertise. Alarmed Ruckus management tried to get CommScope to help stop the hemorrhaging but CS management just saw every high-salary Ruckus departure as money saved to their bottom line. There was no recognition on the CS side that that loss (especially in engineering and PLM) was not sustainable. CS precipitated the Ruckus de–hspiral but still expected Ruckus to be the life boat to save the aging tech lines that make up Arris and CS. All of this was entirely predictable and yet, it's shocking just how fast CS was able to destroy not just itself but Arris and Ruckus.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2bpl+1aiRr9yu

Post a reply

: