Thread regarding IBM layoffs

Average Salaries by Band - see where you fit!

Here are the average (+/- 5% deviation might exist) salaries by Band:-
4 & 5's = $50K
6 & 7'S = 60-80K
8's= 100-120K
9's = 140K
10'S = 150-170K
D's = 220 - 250K Base + 30K stock vesting in 2-3 yrs
C's = 280-310K Base + 40K stock vesting in 2-3 yrs
B's= 350-450K + 60K stock vesting in 2-3 yrs
A's = 750K + 80K stock + 100K in preferred shares
AA's = F u money - go flip your burgers!

by
| 6601 views | | 29 replies (last January 4, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+18E2Ju0A

29 replies (most recent on top)

Wow. I was so underpaid. At EVERY level.

For the people who say the numbers are old or not accurate, are you White (Caucasian)?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @9llh+18E2Ju0A

Band 10s don't always make over 200K on the base alone. People with quotas have a high-end base of 150-170 (aka reference salary) and makeup the difference if they make quota. The first comment is incorrect.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6zxo+18E2Ju0A

that is so off, band 10s make over 200k in any location , if you are a band10 under 200k have a talk with your manager

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5nqx+18E2Ju0A

All these numbers are like 20% less than true numbers ...like 10 years old

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5psl+18E2Ju0A

None of this is even remotely close to accurate.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4swd+18E2Ju0A

@4nmj+18E2Ju0A seems like you're the op.

You do realize that this jeopardizes ibmers position to negotiate salaries right?

That's why it's a stupid post and should be #deleted

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4mqx+18E2Ju0A

@4djr You don’t like what you see, move on- it sure smells like you are from HR and don’t like seeing this out on the open!
I may not agree with these ranges 100% ,but will never want to ‘cancel’ this out - Grow up

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4nmj+18E2Ju0A

These numbers are 10 years old. Someone in hr is trying to #harm ibmers further.

Can #admins #delete this thread pls

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4djr+18E2Ju0A

Band 8 in sales and made $160k salary (plus commission)..just left in November because you couldn’t pay me double to keep working for IBM

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3vhz+18E2Ju0A

From all the comments it looks like everyone makes more than the salaries posted - so why are people complaining about ibm this ibm that ?!

U people make more than 90% of the country , so IBM is not that bad as everyone claims it to be!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3kzz+18E2Ju0A

I was a band 3 making a salary between a band 7 and band 8 to this chart go figure

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ted+18E2Ju0A

Band 03 pays more than band 05 in certain markets so bands mean nothing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ujv+18E2Ju0A

WORST POST EVER
Fake news.
It depends on your location numbnutz.

Someone delete this thread.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ghp+18E2Ju0A

Band 7 Financial Analyst here making $68K - Very depressing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ogl+18E2Ju0A

There is significant overlap in band salaries. I have had Band 8’s with a higher base than Band 9. Additionally with most acquisitions (Not RH) we absorb acquired employees into our organization and quite frequently they have higher salaries than existing IBM people. This is particularly true if the employee has been with IBM for some time and have not been aggressive in seeking above market/out of cycle raises. So often acquired employed come in at a higher band so we can maintain their salary.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pmo+18E2Ju0A

Hey GO FIGURE.
Never said I was in Admin support. Your knowledge of IBM technician bands is pretty limited.
How about research lab techs, FAB techs, engineering techs, facilities techs and so on.

We keep the tools running and the lights on !

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ewe+18E2Ju0A

I beg to differ but it’s a failure of a CEO and “Board” that reward her for failure (and those CEOs before her that also absconded with big payouts) - not some lowly personnel that make $100k.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1klw+18E2Ju0A

A Band 5 making 100K as a Secretary is why IBM is where it is now - in the toilet!

Go Figure!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lmp+18E2Ju0A

You are totally misinformed here

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bks+18E2Ju0A

LMAO ! Not even close for this band 5.
I was making 50K in 1990 !
2009 - 2019 (retired) I was making $100K with overtime.
Not bad for a high school education.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ccg+18E2Ju0A

The range for each band is massive and there’s significant overlap between bands. This list is way off and only has a very simple view. Also doesn’t take location into account.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yiw+18E2Ju0A

Band 9, US... I make 165K and I am 20K away from 100% PMR... So I do think your numbers are way off!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qhw+18E2Ju0A

this is way off

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pdz+18E2Ju0A

How depressing. In my internal role, I earn less than the bottom end of the band below mine.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ovf+18E2Ju0A

I remember briefly seeing a wage range per band, it had the minimum and maximum wages. Does anyone have this info for software engineers?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lyp+18E2Ju0A

Band 7 with masters start at 110K for software engineering. Non premium location. I was told by the offering manager that San Jose and NYC were higher.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1sok+18E2Ju0A

I dont believe this salary range applies to Premium job markets such as California Bay Area of New York City, which may be slightly higher.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wjc+18E2Ju0A

Is this reference salary or base? sales are paid differently. Base is like 82% of reference and you add commission.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cqs+18E2Ju0A

What qualifications do the D and above folks usually have?

Seems to me, a lot of board folks went the "Harvard MBA -> McKinsey Consulting -> Board Member" route and never were worker bees in the conventional sense.

What's a typical D and above job title?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1eqi+18E2Ju0A

Pretty close - but u have to take into account location!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1eal+18E2Ju0A

Post a reply

: