Thread regarding Occidental Petroleum Corp. layoffs

Shale Ponzi Scheme is the Cause of ...

Oxy’s troubles and the downfall of the entire US O&G industry.

VH’s re-election is easily explainable by the Ponzi scheme operated by collusion between shareholders and company executives, from small operations to the majors.

Examples:
Chesapeake’s mgmt team awarded $25MM in bonuses right around the time that company issued a filing warning about potential bankruptcy.

Whiting declared bankruptcy April 1, while execs got $14.6MM in cash bonuses

Clay Williams (CEO of NOV) got $3MM in stock in February despite presiding over a 65% decline in stock prices from 2017 to 2020.

From 2010 to 2019, top 5 US O&G majors generated $340B in free cash flow while giving shareholders $556B in stock buybacks and dividends.

Mostly due to the over-promising and under-delivering of the Shale Ponzi scheme, where execs get personally enriched by borrowing money to pay off investors. Basically, privatizing the profits and foisting debt/losses off on the public / taxpayers. Coming wave of bankruptcies will be price that everyone else pays for execs’ greed and incompetence.

Oxy’s current situation is due to VH’s (and her EC’s) doubling down on the Shale Ponzi scheme every year from 2017-2019, abetted by lying charlatans (e.g., PJB and Apache Mafia).

In that light, it’s easy to see how shareholders keep voting in incompetents like VH.

First victims are employees. As Oxy VSPER, I got out in nick of time, but VH and her EC have caused huge pain to all remaining EE’s, be they LOXY or LAPC.

Next victims will be debt-holders when BK’s start. I wonder how many pension funds were convinced to buy Shale Ponzi debt?

COVID-19 was NOT the cause of the mess, it was catalyst that accelerated the existing trend.

by
| 3171 views | | 7 replies (last June 4, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+15cBYk64

7 replies (most recent on top)

Oil saturation was inflated to keep drainage area small...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6tiv+15cBYk64

Graduate level chemical, mechanical, and electrical engineers have been traditionally hired for reservoir engineering assignments because of their highly developed analytical and numerical skills. These are not easy curriculums in college. Where some companies fail is in hiring a whole army of BS engineers straight out of school and then not giving them proper training. Some companies have formal training (or used to) to expose new hires to a variety of disciplines and assignments, not only to check them out in the first year but to round them out. That is a good system.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2gzn+15cBYk64

Oxy hired aeronautical, NASA engineers, Biomedical, Chemical, Pharmaceutical people and arm-force veterans and gave them the title of Reservoir Engineers. With the typical training of swim or sink, unrealistic deadlines, and pressure from their boss to deliver results, those people had to come up with forecasts not knowing what they were doing. Reserves processes was audited, not the number itself. Middle managers didn’t know either because they were facilities or drilling engineers, or didn’t care. They were navigating a don’t rock my boat culture. Now you see the results.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2fzw+15cBYk64

EURs of 900MMBOE that PXD was claiming a few years ago was indeed a big lie. Oxy never got to that point but Apache mafia came to reign over us and was stretching the Oil Saturation out of a reasonable range. Every company that participated in the core based Corelab consortium seemed to avoid the core truth because it didn’t fit their unrealistic expectation of inflating reserves. On top of that sone of the well tests had so much water it was hard to account for the little oil cut, so ended up reporting more oil!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2bmx+15cBYk64

Any RE’s on here that want to discuss drainage areas? I don’t care which basin, they’re all larger than any executive will admit.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rup+15cBYk64

There are so many free resources to fact-check O&G company claims. Shalepeofile is my favorite, many dashboards are free. Any investor not using this is a fool.

Shale plays are a house of cards, those of us working them the last 10 years all know that.

Guess what? Production isn’t limited to a “zone” and fracs go a lot further than what your gofer model suggests.

Only companies that got in early and CHEAP will see 2021.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jdd+15cBYk64

TLDR

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nhg+15cBYk64

"A Ponzi scheme is a form of fraud that lures investors and pays profits to earlier investors with funds from more recent investors. The scheme leads victims to believe that profits are coming from product sales or other means, and they remain unaware that other investors are the source of funds."

"Lures investors" - Investors being the 2030+yr bond holders with a bet on oil prices

"pays profits to earlier investors" - Some of this goes to the C-suite (which is disgusting) but that's relatively a small amount. The majority should pay down near term maturities so that you can continue to play the game. Or you can decide to kick the can down the road by hiring Moelis to help with refinancing. Either way, the game continues.

Any RE should know that a 30 year forecast is not realistic. Tell me about a horizontal shale well of 2010 vintage or earlier that is still online and the OPEX makes sense to keep it online at $50 oil (forget about $30 oil)...it just ain't happening.

The truth of it is that the declines on these shale wells are so steep, that you have to keep drilling to maintain production. VH even talked about %25 YoY base declines....that's your FCF declining. You have to take a high percentage of that "FCF" and throw it back to the drilling rig to appease to the street and after that CAPEX is applied - you're expected to pay down debt, interest, G&A, and return something to shareholders - all of which we're trying to find ways to not do those things...this is a joke.

Anyway, investors are starting to figure this out which is why $hitco stonk prices will never be back to what they were when investors didn't understand how it works.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uqv+15cBYk64

Post a reply

: