Thread regarding Disney layoffs

Reopening is the best decision to help out Cast members

Reopening allows the company to stay afloat and avoid firing and laying off workers as the revenues offset the very obvious fixed expenses (rent, maintenance contracts, taxes, utilities)

But what about COVID-19?
For COVID-19 the Infection Fatality Rate is in the range of 0.5% to 1.0%.
The common flu ranges from 0.13% to 0.22%.

Do we go back to work for a extremely small risk, or have a 100% certainty of being laid off and having no job, health insurance, and becoming homeless when unemployment runs out?

Disney is trying hard to balance risk of infection vs having to lay off workers. It’s a hard decision but if we continue to close then there is a 100% certainty of being laid off.

The question then becomes at its extremes, Would you choose to have a 1.0% chance of dying or a 100 % chance of being homeless?

by
| 1231 views | | 4 replies (last July 30, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+15LJlnvJ

4 replies (most recent on top)

I love all cast members, however, Disney does not receive the same productivity from each Cast member. Some work hard. There are several who call out on a regular basis when there are millions of Employees who would love to be working and they let down their team . If you are someone who shows up and works much harder to pick up the slack it makes your perspective change and it's sad . Disney has to employ more help to pick up the slack and it's because of the Union. The union did Absolutely nothing for it's cast members in March 2019 , however, they will go to bat for someone who calls out 50 percent of the time and does minimal when in attendance.
If Disney hired based on performance and work ethic they'd save a lot of costs on Labor.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @raoq+15LJlnvJ

"We should hope that more 60 year old and older cast members retire to make this easier on the younger generations." To the person who wrote this, we are not disposable employees just because we are older.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6qlp+15LJlnvJ

Do you think Mitch McConnell will actually pass any legislation benefitting anyone other than banks on his watch? That’s a no! Unemployment is ending. If anyone gets laid off at this point you’re finding a job that pays much worse than the current one.

I agree with the OP that by preparing for the worst case scenario with exaggerated numbers you can then make decisions to mitigate risk. Irregardless opening has to reoccur because any of the money printed won’t help Disney with the $1B+ in revenue it’s losing for every month it’s closed

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bcv+15LJlnvJ

Theres not a 100% chance of being homeless, theres other jobs available in the market plus there's assistance from the first coronavirus Bill and more coming this month from the next bill which will likely pass. And the chance of being infected and dying varies depending on too many factors but it's certainly can be higher than 1%. Also stats like fatality rate are ever changing and can only be properly evaluated AFTER the disease has been controlled. So your numbers are a bit exaggerated to say the least.

As to the financial aspect, the company could afford to close and seek reimbursement from the government through carefully constructed legislation. This is why they laid off cast members in April, the stimulus bill added extra money to unemployment and gave businesses funds that were impacted by the virus.

Regardless, layoffs will happen because its how the game works. To think reopening with 20% capacity will ward off an extensive layoff session is after the fiscal year is not realistic.
Many positions won't be needed and cuts will be pushed by executives to regain a company's strength. We should hope that more 60 year old and older cast members retire to make this easier on the younger generations.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @puh+15LJlnvJ

Post a reply

: