Thread regarding Sabre Holdings layoffs

Why a loan instead of government assistance?

Airlines got billions. They cannot layoff or furlough employees because of this until Sep. 30, as far as I know. But it also limits executive compensation. Why did not Sabre take government assistance? Anyone knows?

by
| 2861 views | | 7 replies (last April 23, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+14AfZT0V

7 replies (most recent on top)

You answered your own question

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2hop+14AfZT0V

It has nothing to do with H1B folks. It's only because of limits on executive compensation and layoffs of US employees. Blame the execs, not the poor guy at your level.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vvd+14AfZT0V

Government bailouts come with strict rules, including not letting go of US employees and requiring E level executives to take a 2/3 pay cut for the next 2 years. Any other questions as to why the executives chose not to take a government bail out?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vwk+14AfZT0V

Sabre doesn't want the government assistance because the government will impose Sabre to bring back jobs from India and stop hiring so many H1B's. Corporate GREED!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yox+14AfZT0V

We don't know if BLR had been ommited. Indian labor law may not have anything equivalent to furlough in it, so they could just unceremoniously lay off people later instead.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qbg+14AfZT0V

Why was India omitted from the furloughs?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kqb+14AfZT0V

Sabre doesn't want the government to control them as to when they can lay off. They also don't want the backlash for what follows, mass movement of US jobs to India.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wfu+14AfZT0V

Post a reply

: