Thread regarding Staples Inc. layoffs

A comprehensive list of all leaders who were let go

Several leaders were let go in the recent bloodbath. More to come. 15+ VPs and Sr. Directors and around 10 Directors were laid off. Some of them were shocking as they were true leaders who were helping this company turn around - guess SD/SP didn't like them or didn't care. They did keep some stupid leaders who should have been kicked out months ago.

Legal: VP Legal (S S-L) and at least 3-4 lower level folks. They will pay more to outside counsels now and it's totally stupid letting go experienced and great people.

HR: Totally decimated and gutted - shows SP/SD don't care about people or talent. At least 2 Directors (J-L K, TR) and 15+ Sr. Manager/Manager etc.

Commercial: SVP Sales (TH), VP Digital Sales/eCom (GN), VP Strategic Transformation (DL), VP Sales (TS), VP Customer Service (JB), VP Sales/BD (SB), RVP Sales (BP), VP/GM SPP (RW). They let go 30+ lower level folks in the corporate and several more in the field. They created a new Marketing and Merchandising department that no one seems to understand. A new digital department that is a bunch of misfits. They will struggle saving Staples.com business.

Marketing: VP Creative (GG), Sr. Director Marketing Ops (AK), Sr. Director Customer Analytics (KB), Director Media (NY), Director SEO (RD), Director SBA Marketing (KR) plus around 25-30 more Marketers. They also demoted the previous CMO (MW) who was running both commercial and Retail marketing to only Retail stores. Marketing was broken into several smaller pieces and stuck under business units - will it work? no one knows. Marketing hasn't done much for this company anyways other than spending millions of dollars in brand stupidity and 20 million bringing everyone to the brand launch sh– show in Orlando. They should have fired all of them.

Finance: 2 VPs (MC & VD) plus 5-9 lower level folks.

Merchandising: Surprise, surprise - this is where they were supposed to clean up. Lol but they didn't. Around 20 of lower level folks were let go. This means another layoff is on the horizon within 3-6 months where they will sweep Merchandising. Wait and watch.

SDS/Engineering: No senior level exits - they had already gone through some exits before. Couple of their VPs should have been kicked out but they weren't. They let 30-50 lower level folks go through - that's totally b—s— because this contradicts what CEO of the company announced. The CTO is running around like a maniac not knowing how to deliver. SD had promised to clean the top but he didn't and still kept 83 VPs around. But let hard workers in SDS who were driving their eCommerce platforms and other transformation projects go - this is totally stupid. This company is going to be bankrupt soon. Good luck to those who stayed. Find a job elsewhere soon if you care for your family.

by
| 5171 views | | 20 replies (last September 23, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+112EirdB

20 replies (most recent on top)

SDS/Engineering: way too many useless VPs and Directors. WA, HR, SW, PB, NV and more - arrogant jerks who are useless and don’t do anything. Too many Directors just collecting a paycheck, while the actual people working are let go. No wonder staples engineering spends the most and produce little

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @9mow+112EirdB

There were promotions in finance, on 5west this week, a few new directors, and unnecessary roles and titles created during all this turmoil, real poor taste, all things considered from last week.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6gwl+112EirdB

Many more people were let go in merch. My team alone we lost an Assoc. DMM, 2 merchants, and 2 specialists. I also think they will have another sweep once everyone starts to settle into their new roles.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3hmx+112EirdB

It’s hard to market mediocrity.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3tvm+112EirdB

I wouldn't trash marketing either. Anyone that thinks that if you build it they will come has never had an actual business nor ran one.

Staples marketing folks are or were competent. At least at the manager and director levels. They all know their craft.

If an org says 'let's be more profitable' and you say 'ok but sales will decline' and they say 'ok' and if pricing is bad and if assortment is one dimensional and table stakes then it's like marketing lipstick on a pig.

If I advertised to you that SG, RS and SyPa were all effective at running companies (other than into the ground) would you buy it?

Hell no. Same thing!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2cpo+112EirdB

Not sure you can discredit marketing quite so much. The organization is lead by operationally-minded merchants who don't understand what a brand is or the nurturing it needs.

I speak solely as a supplier to the company, every good idea is shot down at the CEO level - he has an ego and an agenda that do not take the health of the brand to heart. His interest is solely to cut waste and drive short term gains. Unfortunately whoever has put him in charge underestimates the competition.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2rgf+112EirdB

SDS/Engineering: No senior level exits - they had already gone through some exits before. Couple of their VPs should have been kicked out but they weren't.

Curious who you think should get the boot. Maybe the VP of Tech Strategy & Operations (SW) for starters?

========
Yes SW and HR the VP of data - he is a prick and the least collaborative person this world has ever witnessed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2fox+112EirdB

Any layoffs in Canada? YTD sales are down about 3.5% but gross margins are up about 10% compared to same time last year.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2avz+112EirdB

Merchandising was in fact hit pretty hard. It wasn't just merchants though. A handful of merchants, a bunch of product specialists, at least 5 in the product world along with some senior managers and directors. They also split the merchant world up into buy side and sell side, and split the product teams up. We had at least 15 open recs from people that left on their own accord in the last 6 months which they closed so the remaining employees need to maintain that coverage.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2zpz+112EirdB
SDS/Engineering: No senior level exits - they had already gone through some exits before. Couple of their VPs should have been kicked out but they weren't.

Curious who you think should get the boot. Maybe the VP of Tech Strategy & Operations (SW) for starters?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2roo+112EirdB

I didnt know we had a marketing department. Who knew they paid people to do that. I thought it was some high levels kids.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2okl+112EirdB

Finally, somebody on this site comee through with the goods instead of making another stupid "you're next!!" post

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2iyb+112EirdB

Would have liked to see finance trimmed down more. Alot of high salaries and low iqs on 5west.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ttq+112EirdB

Marketing is the f—ing worst. Forget the obvious ways they've mismanaged the brand, they are the most difficult group to work with in the building. Should've gotten rid of em all and started with a clean slate.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kvj+112EirdB

I'm sure I know whom is being referred to. Isn't just marketing that is affected by their existence. I would also prefer to see them out of the way.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bmb+112EirdB

I'd also add that some people in marketing relied on support from non supportive teams cross organization to succeed. There are certain people in the org that made it impossible to succeed by being one dimensional, egotistical and flat out reckless. I can't wait till we see them walked out!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nkj+112EirdB

the "turn around" is an illusion to support the debt issue and IPO. you shouldn't be surprised at the layoffs at all.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gmu+112EirdB

Let me point out there are some very smart people in marketing (esp if you look back pre the last couple of layoffs). These smart people in marketing are forced to do whatever the very top wants (cmo and some VPs). 99% of time we are forced to spend money in ways we don’t agree w. ....over and over again. Like insane decisions. We try telling leadership we disagree with their approach and they don’t want to hear it. We get shut out and eventually kicked out. They want every to just drink the look aid and do what they are told. The last 2 cmo hires have been disasters and the cmo before that was nice but retiring and didn’t want to shake things up. When asked why we abandoned “that was easy” campaign, the response was “we weren’t easy any more”. Can you believe it? Instead of fixing the biz so it WAS easy, we just changed taglines. We also bring up “the most wonderful time of yr” ad and said we should run it again and we were told to never bring it up again. No wonder it’s sinking the the titanic

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vvm+112EirdB

Outstanding post, thank you!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dje+112EirdB

Very comprehensive post. Sad. Spot on about marketing and wasted money for brand (re) launches. Should have just stuck with "That Was Easy" and saved the extra $$. A customer buying what are essentially commodities wants it to be easy above all else, so that always seemed pretty compelling when to me. I would have to think that everyone there is looking.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @iar+112EirdB

Post a reply

: