Thread regarding Cengage layoffs

Cengage will end up being a shell of what it is now

Cengage has some great content but the problem is the online platforms are kind of stuck in 2005. SAM was always a cash cow because it did what it did better than anything else at the time and back when it started most of the A+/MCSE post recession places that were being funded by unemployment retraining grants jumped on board and bought the books, software, etc....

The NG partnership should have been a license to print money but somehow that failed year after year after year.

A lot of the content, as good as it may be, isn't so much better than what professors can find online for free or at very reduced prices. Print going rental was a good idea but way too late and so much money is wasted on producing new editions of old titles just to attempt to k–l the used market takes a huge amount of revenue.

Cengage won't go out of business but I think it's going to end up being a shell of what it is right now. Even MindTap, for what it ism, has cost a huge amount of money to develop and support. If you think about it all you get is an e-book that's hard to read and some videos (lots of YouTube), RSS feeds and mid 2000's activities - drag and drop, fill in the blanks, etc... not all that engaging or exciting in 2019.

Good post from @10k15AFN-5wmx.

by
| 1151 views | | 3 replies (last August 6, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+10pjiz9B

3 replies (most recent on top)

OER has gotten to the point where it is "good enough" for probably around 80% of courses..certainly good enough for almost 100% of intro-level courses, which is where the publishers make most of their money. The remaining 20% are specialized or high level courses which are low volume titles. The new McGraw/Cengage and Pearson will be fighting for these relative sc-aps. I don't see how they both survive in their current forms (even with a combined Cengage and McGraw) serving such a tiny portion of the market. They're going to have to expand into services or SAAS if they want to survive, and given Cengage's track record in those areas it is not likely to be successful.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @iaq+10pjiz9B

Cengage has always been great at content, but mediocre to bad at developing software. The original MindTap rollout in 2010 would have been a monumental disaster had it actually been adopted by more than a handful of professors. Revenue and employee wise Cengage already is a shell of what it once was. Revenue has declined something like 40% from a decade ago. I don't know what the headcount is, but it must have declined around the same rate.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @llp+10pjiz9B

It actually is going out of business very soon and so is McGraw hill, neither can compete in this OER driven market and out of the ashes will rise like a phoenix, a fat new bird called McCengage! However, this new albatross of a phoenix won’t be soaring for long, it too will fail year after year while it’s brave employees consume and regurgitate the same old flavor of kool aid just as before while revenue drops year after year after year...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tit+10pjiz9B

Post a reply

: