Original Poster: The $1.7B loan is not a lifeline. It is essentially the equivalent of throwing a cinder bloc to someone drowning. McDermott does not get the full $1.7B. They have access to $650M today. They get access to the remainder after they prove the company won’t default on the first $650M.
Can they file for Bankruptcy after the loan? Yes. Why? Because the loan does very little to help the overall balance sheet with the 12% interest. This loan has strict payback terms. It is a mechanism that causes the company to be cash poor and cash flow will remain tight because of the strict pay back terms. This loan is payable before all other debts and bond holders. This is called a Super Priority Note. Translation: when/if they file for Bankruptcy, the very first checks cut will be to pay a back the Super Priority Notes ($650M). The banks will get their $650M before anything else gets paid, including bond holders, shareholders and PAYROLL (in that order).
These notes get paid before licensors on Cameron & Freeport, before GE on Asheville, before Mitsubishi on Lake Charles and Montgomery County, before the modular fabricators on the Offshore.
The problem with McDermott has been paying BOTH the interest on the debt (servicing debt) and supporting projects (subcontracts and vendors). The talking points from management has been “We have been a victim of our success. We have to pay for all of these Letters of Credit”.
That is laughable. It is partially true, but it is a lipstick on a pig. They are trying to cover up the fact that LNG, Power and a few Offshore losses have taken their tole on the balance sheet by forcing MDR to take on more debt to cover the losses.
This brings everything full circle. The problem with McDermott has been paying BOTH the interest on the debt (servicing debt) and supporting projects (subcontracts and vendors).
I have not shorted the stock. I will never short the stock because everyday I wish for McDermott to pull out of this nosedive.
To the poster who mentioned only Executive Management would know this. You are half correct. This information starts with executives and trickles down to the management levels for implementation. We as managers sit in on meetings, calls and are CC’d on emails. We use our own discernment and analytical skills to forecast cost and political moves.
I encourage those who remain skeptical, about reading the post from an anonymous source, to do your own research. Ask the people who are asked by the executives to implement their plans.
Please, don’t take my word on it, do your own research.