Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Why Krzanich Had to Go

https://www.eetimes.com/author.asp?section_id=36&doc_id=1333415

by
| 2632 views | | 4 replies (last June 25, 2018) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+TQBVqhZ

4 replies (most recent on top)

The article keeps the story fresh. The BoD probably has covered up the story to a degree. There have been stories floating around about BK's many tentacles reaching out for more than one female over the past 25 years. For the BoD to say "a consensual relationship" is probably only part of a much larger story. Anyhow it keeps the questions being asked, the reports on the scent like a pack of bloodhounds, until all the information is known.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @glm+TQBVqhZ

Agree with @tsu, the EE Times author is off the mark. Corporations love to spin things in the best possible light, just like politicians. The Register has the best public assessment in my opinion.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mje+TQBVqhZ

totally off the mark???

i'd say it's partially true

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ojs+TQBVqhZ

Every female journo is latching on the #metoo political think of the times. Even though this case has little intersection with that side of things. They have no clue to what else BK has done to the company, the products and the general work culture at Intel. The best assessment of BK's resignation is by The Register, pdx-tie.org. Anyone who is looking at this as a purely #metoo this has no clue about Intel as company and the semiconductor industry in general and how BK damaged, somewhat irreparably, Intel's supremacy in chip business. This EETimes piece is totally off the mark.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tsu+TQBVqhZ

Post a reply

: