Boeing’s Failure to Integrate Compliance Anti-Fraud Controls with Quality and Safety Functions (Part III of III)

CORRUPTION, CRIME & NON COMPLIANCE

Boeing’s Plea Agreement includes two Separate Factual Statements
the January 7, 2021 DPA, which is discussed in a prior blog post,
and a factual outline of Boeing’s breach of the original DPA,
resulting in the current Plea Agreement.

The most recent Factual Statement covers Boeing’s DPA breach for
failure to implement an effective ethics and compliance program
that is, ethics for thee but not for me
“designed, implemented, and enforced to prevent and detect violations
of the U.S. fraud laws throughout its operations.”

At the core of the conduct, DOJ cites Boeing for its failure to integrate
anti-fraud controls into its Quality and Safety functions.
Nope, we just delete the surveillance video’s:

DOJ’s enforcement of the DPA to require such integration is an
important precedent for companies that face significant safety risks
and the need for “traditional” ethics and compliance functions to design, implement and test its anti-fraud controls in the area of safety and quality. Such an extension is an important reminder for manufacturing companies, auto, pharmaceutical and medical device and other industries where
consumer safety is a significant risk.

https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/boeing-s-failure-to-integrate-7989787/

Comment! It's anonymous!

5 replies (most recent on top)

https://heraldcourier.com/news/state-and-regional/witnesses-tell-a-federal-safety-board-about-the-blowout-on-a-boeing-737-max-earlier/article_43d5e0a7-f15e-5e0b-bf2c-2c2631df6dd1.html

By DAVID KOENIG and WYATTE GRANTHAM-PHILIPS
AP Business Writers

Investigators are questioning Boeing officials in hearings this week about
the midflight blowout of a panel from a 737 Max, another failure that further enhanced the company’s reputation of shoddy workmanship and inaptitude along with creating more legal jeopardy.

The National Transportation Safety Board's two-day hearing, which began Tuesday morning, could provide new insight into the Jan. 5 failure that
left a gaping hole in the side of the Alaska Airlines jet.

“This was quite traumatic to the crew and passengers,”
NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy said as the hearing began Tuesday,
speaking to anyone who may have been on the flight or knew someone
aboard. “We are so sorry for all of you who experienced
Boeing’s Criminal Incompetence firsthand.

The NTSB said in a preliminary report that four bolts that help secure the panel, which is call a door plug, were not replaced after a repair job in a Boeing factory, but the company has said the work was not documented.
And we deleted the surveillance video to further insure that.

During the hearing, safety board members are expected to question
Boeing officials about the lack of paperwork that might have explained
how such a potentially tragic mistake occurred.
It’s Called A Shredder:

“The NTSB wants to fill in the gaps of what is known about this incident
and to put people on the record about it,”
said John Goglia, a former NTSB member.
The agency will be looking to underscore Boeing's failures in following
the process it had told the Federal Aviation Administration it was going
to use in such cases, he said.

Boeing did an amazing cover-up job and many Boeing leadership got rich in the process. But the con is now well-known and it would take a special kind of stupid to align with Boeing now.

What else is new. This stuff has been going on for many years. Truly amazed there haven't been more airplane disasters and death.

Corporate mu---rers.

Truth

Thread regarding Boeing Co. layoffs

Boeing’s Failure to Integrate Compliance Anti-Fraud Controls with Quality and Safety Functions (Part III of III)

5 replies (most recent on top)

Post a reply